Blog
Writing on reproducibility, open methods, and building jnar.
Answer-first, genuinely useful, and dated. Every post is authored and kept up to date.
Why negative results belong in your methods
The failures you don't publish are the ones the next lab pays for. Here's the case for treating negative results as first-class, citable data.
Reproducibility & open science
The crisis, publication bias, and reproducible methodsThe reproducibility crisis, explained
What the crisis is, what the evidence actually shows, why it happens — and the structural fix that starts with how we record methods.
Publication bias and the file drawer problem
Between 80–95% of papers report positive results. The studies that found nothing sit in a file drawer — and the next lab pays to rediscover them.
How to write a reproducible protocol
Five concrete things turn a method someone else can actually repeat: exact materials, unambiguous steps, version history, recorded failures, and a citable version.
Protocol how-tos
What a protocol is and how to write oneWhat is a lab protocol?
The exact, repeatable recipe for an experiment — what one contains, how it differs from an SOP, and why it's only as good as its latest version.
How to write a lab protocol
A reproducible protocol comes down to seven things: a clear objective, exact materials, single-action steps, explicit parameters, the failure modes, versioning — and not starting from a blank page.